Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/28038
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against recent clinical bacteria collected in Europe and Australia
Author: Livermore, D.
Carter, M.
Bagel, S.
Wiedemann, B.
Baquero, F.
Loza, E.
Endtz, H.
van den Braak, N.
Fernandes, C.
Fernandes, L.
Frimodt-Moller, N.
Rasmussen, L.
Giamarellou, H.
Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.
Jarlier, V.
Nguyen, J.
Nord, C.
Struelens, M.
Nonhoff, C.
Turnidge, J.
et al.
Citation: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001; 45(6):1860-1867
Publisher: Amer Soc Microbiology
Issue Date: 2001
ISSN: 0066-4804
1098-6596
Statement of
Responsibility: 
David M. Livermore, Michael W. Carter, Simone Bagel, Bernd Wiedemann, Fernando Baquero, Elena Loza, Hubert P. Endtz, Nicole Van Den Braak, Clarence J. Fernandes, Lorna Fernandes, Niels Frimodt-Moller, Laura S. Rasmussen, Helen Giamarellou, Evangelos Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Vincent Jarlier, Jacqueline Nguyen, Carl-Erik Nord, Marc J. Struelens, Caire Nonhoff, John Turnidge, Jan Bell, Reinhard Zbinden, Stefan Pfister, Lori Mixson, and Daniel L. Shungu
Abstract: Ertapenem (MK-0826, L-749,345) is a 1-β-methyl carbapenem with a long serum half-life. Its in vitro activity was determined by broth microdilution against 3,478 bacteria from 12 centers in Europe and Australia, with imipenem, cefepime, ceftriaxone, and piperacillin-tazobactam used as comparators. Ertapenem was the most active agent tested against members of the familyEnterobacteriaceae, with MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited (MIC₉₀s) of ≤1 μg/ml for all species. Ertapenem also was more active than imipenem against fastidious gram-negative bacteria and Moraxella spp.; on the other hand, ertapenem was slightly less active than imipenem against streptococci, methicillin-susceptible staphylococci, and anaerobes, but its MIC₉₀s for these groups remained ≤0.5 μg/ml.Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosawere also much less susceptible to ertapenem than imipenem, and mostEnterococcus faecalis strains were resistant. Ertapenem resistance, based on a provisional NCCLS MIC breakpoint of ≥16 μg/ml, was seen in only 3 of 1,611 strains of the familyEnterobacteriaceae tested, all of them Enterobacter aerogenes. Resistance was also seen in 2 of 135 anaerobes, comprising 1 Bacteroides fragilis strain and 1Clostridium difficile strain. Ertapenem breakpoints for streptococci have not been established, but an unofficial susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 μg/ml was adopted for clinical trials to generate corresponding clinical response data for isolates for which MICs were as high as 2 μg/ml. Of 234 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains tested, 2 required ertapenem MICs of 2 μg/ml and one required an MIC of 4 μg/ml, among 67 non-Streptococcus pyogenes, non-Streptococcus pneumoniae streptococci, single isolates required ertapenem MICs of 2 and 16 μg/ml. These streptococci also had diminished susceptibilities to other β-lactams, including imipenem as well as ertapenem. The Etest and disk diffusion gave susceptibility test results in good agreement with those of the broth microdilution method for ertapenem.
Keywords: Bacteria
Carbapenems
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Quality Control
Australia
Europe
Rights: Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1860-1867.2001
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.45.6.1860-1867.2001
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Molecular and Biomedical Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.