Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/39751
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Uninformative characters and apparent conflict between molecules and morphology |
Author: | Lee, M. |
Citation: | Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2001; 18(4):676-680 |
Publisher: | Oxford Univ Press |
Issue Date: | 2001 |
ISSN: | 0737-4038 1537-1719 |
Abstract: | Incongruence between different data sets remains one of the central issues in systematics. Numerous tree- based and character-based tests to identify incongruence have been developed, and each has strengths and weaknesses (e.g., for reviews, see Cunningham 1997a; Johnson and Soltis 1998 ). Currently, one of the most widely used methods for evaluating incongruence within a parsimony framework is the homogeneity test of Farris et al. (1995) , usually termed the incongruence length difference (ILD) test (Cunningham 1997a; but see Johnson and Soltis 1998 ) or the partition homogeneity Test (Swofford 2000 ). The test has been argued to produce more accurate results than other tests (Cunningham 1997a ) and is also easy to implement using PAUP* (Swofford 2000 ). |
Keywords: | Animals Phylogeny Statistics as Topic Biological Evolution |
Rights: | © 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution |
DOI: | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003848 |
Published version: | http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/18/4/676 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Earth and Environmental Sciences publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.