Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/4273
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJones, K.-
dc.contributor.authorWakefield, M.-
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, D.-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationTobacco Control, 1999; 8(1):62-66-
dc.identifier.issn0964-4563-
dc.identifier.issn1468-3318-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/4273-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES---To determine compliance with a voluntary code of practice (VCP) for restricting smoking in restaurants and to canvass the attitudes of restaurateurs towards tougher smoking restrictions. DESIGN---Cross-sectional survey conducted in 1996 using a telephone questionnaire. SETTING---Metropolitan restaurants and cafés in Adelaide, South Australia. PARTICIPANTS---276 (86.8%) of a sample of randomly selected owners and managers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES---Restaurant non-smoking policies, reported and anticipated change in business, and restaurateurs' attitudes towards smoking restrictions. RESULTS---26.8% of restaurants had a total smoking ban; 40.6% restricted smoking some other way; and 32.6% permitted unrestricted smoking. Only 15.1% of restaurants with a ban or restrictions had used the VCP to guide the development of their policy, and only half of these were complying with it. Although 78.4% of those with bans and 84.4% of those with restrictions reported that their non-smoking policy had been associated with either no change or a gain in business, only 33.3% of those allowing unrestricted smoking expected that this would be the case, if they were to limit smoking. A total of 50.4% of restaurateurs, including 45.3% of those with no restrictions, agreed that the government should ban smoking in all restaurants. CONCLUSIONS---The VCP made an insignificant contribution to adoption of non-smoking policies, and compliance with the code was poor. Despite concerns about loss of business, there was considerable support for legislation which would ban smoking in all dining establishments.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKelly Jones, Melanie Wakefield, Deborah A Turnbull-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP-
dc.source.urihttp://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/62-
dc.subjectsmoking restrictions-
dc.subjectrestaurants-
dc.subjectenvironmental tobacco smoke-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.titleAttitudes and experiences of restauranteurs regarding smoking bans in Adelaide, South Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/tc.8.1.62-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTurnbull, D. [0000-0002-7116-7073]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_4273.pdf153.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.