Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/48009
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStreet, J.-
dc.contributor.authorBraunack-Mayer, A.-
dc.contributor.authorFacey, K.-
dc.contributor.authorAshcroft, R.-
dc.contributor.authorHiller, J.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationHealth Expectations, 2008; 11(2):189-200-
dc.identifier.issn1369-6513-
dc.identifier.issn1369-7625-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/48009-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2008 The Authors The definitive version may be found at www.wiley.com-
dc.description.abstractBackground Community views, expressed in social impact assessments and collected through community consultation, should play an important role in health technology assessment (HTA). Yet HTA methodologists have been slow to include outcomes of these forms of inquiry in analyses, in part because collecting community views is time-consuming and resource intensive. Objective To explore how community views sourced from published studies, grey literature and informal internet web pages can inform HTA. Methods A technology reviewed by Adelaide HTA in 2004 was selected: retinal photography for detection of diabetic retinopathy. Published literature, 'grey' literature and informal web pages were searched to examine the availability of evidence about service community and user community views with respect to this technology. Particular efforts were made to source evidence relating to rural, remote and Aboriginal populations. Results We found that journal articles, reports from the grey literature and informal internet web pages (including blogs and discussion forums) can provide valuable insight into community views. Although there was little empirical evidence relating to the experience of diabetes and diabetes management in rural, remote and Aboriginal communities, there were indications that some evidence may be transferable from other populations. Conclusions Community perspectives on selected health technologies can be gauged from available resources in published and grey literature and perspectives collected in this way can provide insight into whether the introduction of the technology would be acceptable to the community. The limitations of this approach are discussed.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJackie M. Street, Annette J. Braunack-Mayer, Karen Facey, Richard E. Ashcroft and Janet E. Hiller-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltd.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00484.x-
dc.subjectbiomedical-
dc.subjectconsumer participation-
dc.subjectdiabetes complications-
dc.subjectpatient acceptance of health care-
dc.subjectsocial impact assessment-
dc.subjecttechnology assessment-
dc.subjectweblogs-
dc.titleVirtual community consultation? Using the literature and weblogs to link community perspectives and health technology assessment-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00484.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidStreet, J. [0000-0002-1033-4341]-
dc.identifier.orcidBraunack-Mayer, A. [0000-0003-4427-0224]-
dc.identifier.orcidHiller, J. [0000-0002-8532-4033]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.