Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/57629
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCollard, F.-
dc.contributor.authorDellas, H.-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationThe Economic Journal, 2007; 117(523):1436-1459-
dc.identifier.issn0013-0133-
dc.identifier.issn1468-0297-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/57629-
dc.description.abstractRecent empirical work has suggested that in response to a positive technology shock employment shows a persistent decline. We show that the standard, open economy, flexible price model can generate a negative response of employment to a positive technology shock and can also match the negative conditional correlation between productivity and employment quite well if trade elasticities are low. While the model also has good overall properties, it fails to generate sufficient procyclicality in employment. This finding indicates that the RBC model faces a tension between accounting for the negative response of employment to technology shocks and simultaneously maintaining that technology shocks are the major source of business cycle fluctuations.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityFabrice Collard and Harris Dellas-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publ Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02090.x-
dc.titleTechnology shocks and employment-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02090.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Economics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.